PETA's 2010 to 2011 undercover investigation of Sacred Vision Animal Sanctuary (SVAS)—founded and operated by hoarder Elizabeth Owen—exposed the chronic deprivation and suffering of approximately 300 cats who were kept in filthy, stifling-hot, dungeon-like, disease-ridden storage units near Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. In April 2012, Owen was convicted of depriving her animals of care and, in part because of South Carolina's weak and outdated laws, was given a sentence that leaves animals in her hands and others at risk!
After reviewing evidence gathered during PETA's investigation, a judge ordered the removal of all the animals from SVAS, which finally shut its doors. But the judge allowed Owen to keep 30 cats and a dog after Owen's attorney claimed that those doomed animals were Owen's "personal pets." Owen was required to provide veterinary care to her 31 "pets" within 14 days of the March 1, 2011, seizure.
But in the year or so between the seizure and Owen's conviction, Horry County officials did nothing to ensure that no more animals suffered and died at Owen's hands. Despite having extensive evidence—including video recordings and dozens of photographs—of Owen's conduct and its fatal consequences for her animals, prosecutors (known as "solicitors" in South Carolina) never filed state cruelty-to-animals charges against her. Instead, the evidence was passed from one assistant solicitor to another, and all of them sat on it.
Meanwhile, county officials failed to keep their promise to ensure that the 31 "pets" returned to Owen received the veterinary examinations and care required of her. PETA asked county officials to check on those animals month after month for a year, to no avail. According to solicitors, Owen even left South Carolina—evidently along with those animals—even though a condition of her court case was that she could not leave the state. For all county officials and solicitors know, another SVAS could have been started in another community, given that the relapse rate for animal hoarders is virtually 100 percent.
Read more about PETA's findings at SVAS here, and view photos from the investigation now.
The court did not restrict Owen's possession of animals nor order a psychological evaluation—common and critical elements of sentencing in animal hoarding cases. In the wake of Owen's case, Horry County amended its animal protection ordinances to prohibit some aspects of animal hoarding, such as depriving a large number of companion animals of care in severely crowded conditions. However, the change did nothing to enable courts to prohibit convicted hoarders from owning or possessing animals and does not spell out for judges the ways in which they can prevent future cruelty (for example, requiring a psychiatric evaluation and necessary counseling) when sentencing animal hoarders.
Please help ensure that animals are better protected from animal addicts like Owen by urging the Horry County Council and Paul Whitten, the county's assistant administrator for public safety, to require that convicted hoarders be prohibited from owning or possessing animals and be required to undergo a psychiatric evaluation and any recommended treatment..." Link to petition
This blog was created to keep you up-to-date on animal hoarding and large scale animal news and cruelty.
Because hoarding and OCD disorders often overlap, we will also list news and information related to these topics, and how these illness's affect the hoarder, their family and friends, but most of all the animals, that suffer... "alone in a crowded room".
Thank you for visiting.
Learn more about Animal Hoarding at our other site:
Disclaimer: We are not responsible for the content of the sites linked. Linked sites may change without our knowledge. The inclusion of such links in our web site does not imply endorsement/innocence/guilt of the sites or their content but is provided as a service to our users. The presence of a link is not an endorsement of the site. We make no representations whatsoever about any other web sites that you may access through this one.We do not accept any responsibility for the content, or the use, of such site. It is your responsibility to take precautions to ensure that whatever you select for your use is free of such items as viruses, worms, Trojan horses and other items of a destructive nature. In no event will we be liable to any party for any personal, direct, indirect, special or other consequential damages for any use of this web site, or on any other linked web site, including, without limitation, any lost profits, business interruption, loss of programs or other data on your information handling system.You are encouraged to seek the help of licensed professionals in your area or seek governmental assistance. This blog is for informational purposes only, inclusion of a story, name or incident does not imply guilt or innocence, we are sharing the information as it was presented.